Re: devfs - why not ?

From: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 16:43:43 EST

Next message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Stahl, David: "SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 13 Apr, Andreas Dilger wrote:
+-----
| Actually, MS-DOS formatted floppies have had a serial number since the
| beginning of time:
+--->8

"MS-DOS 3.0" was not "the beginning of time", sorry.

-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Previous message: Stahl, David: "SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST