Ed Carp <erc@pobox.com> writes:
> Terje Kvernes (terjekv@ifi.uio.no) writes:
>
> > personally I'd like to see procdump at least not produce html, it
> > should instead produce XML and one should have a nice XSL to go
> > with that. but I digress. (this should exist no matter how one
> > chooses to display the information to users of course ,)
>
> No, no, NO! Straight ASCII. Forget the latest XML/XSL BS/hype.
in the files, yes! but I'd like a tools to present this information
(no matter how it is stored) as XML for other use. I really thought I
was clear on that. ;)
> Why is it that people who should know better always jump on the
> latest and greatest technological whizz-bang like it's the silver
> bullet that will cure all ills?
well, at least I'll take that '...people who should know better...' as
a compliment. thanks! =)
-- Terje- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST