Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2000 - 20:29:11 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Part of that is probably that sysctl (a) is very messy inside the kernel
> > and (b) there is noone really maintaining the MIBs. Would it help if I
> > volunteered to maintain the MIBs?
>
> Currently the mibs I've seen are the sysctl numbers so we get them anyway
> but they might as well be maintained and official.
>

Right, and that's of course the whole point with sysctl numbers --
having a uniform numeric representation.

> The devices.txt stuff works fine so I definitely have no problem with you
> being MIBmaster too

If noone else objects I'll look into this as soon as I can shake free a
few hours, including where they should be grafted onto the snmp tree
root. Pointers to existing practice appreciated.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST