Re: BUG: disk corruption 2.3.99-pre4-pre3

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu Apr 06 2000 - 19:11:15 EST


Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Simon Kirby wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 04:19:15PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > > Copying an ISO from a 2.2.15-pre17 SMP box, over a network, to a
> > > > 2.3.99-pre4-pre3 K6 box.
>
> Is this a VIA chipset core??

Yep.

Last night I tested this machine with 2.2.14, 2.2.15-pre15,
2.2.15-pre17, 2.3.99-pre[34]*, with compilers gcc 2.95.2 and egcs
1.1.2. Two runs of 'md5sum' on the same ISO image would always yield
two different sums. I even switched the BIOS to its most conservative
settings before getting too far into my testing, and disabled
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL items like the via82cxxx support in 2.2.15pre.

I am going to do some more testing with gcc 2.7.2.* and kernel 2.0.38 /
kernel 2.2.10. If the results are the same, I am going to assume bad
hardware in this case, possibly bad DRAM.

My dual PII box (PIIX4) consistently gives me good md5sums for all
kernels 2.2.x and 2.3.x under gcc 2.95.2...

        Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik              | Tact is the ability to tell a man 
Building 1024            | he has an open mind when he has a
MandrakeSoft, Inc.       | hole in his head.  (-random fortune)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST