Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Wed Apr 05 2000 - 02:18:02 EST

Next message: Jones D (ISaCS): "RE: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Jones D (ISaCS): "RE: WAKE-UP-CALL :: IronGate VIA K7 (ATA) WORKS!!!"
In reply to: Dominik Kubla: "English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Next in thread: Jordan Mendelson: "Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Reply: Jordan Mendelson: "Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dominik Kubla wrote:
>
> You should know as well as anybody that Linux has always favoured the
> English spelling over the American.

Finnglish, actually.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jones D (ISaCS): "RE: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Jones D (ISaCS): "RE: WAKE-UP-CALL :: IronGate VIA K7 (ATA) WORKS!!!"
In reply to: Dominik Kubla: "English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Next in thread: Jordan Mendelson: "Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Reply: Jordan Mendelson: "Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST