Re: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs.

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjan@fenrus.demon.nl)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2000 - 00:09:23 EST


In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004032214310.6832-100000@nemesis.local> you wrote:

> The following diff removes some compiler warnings of unused functions
> and results in smaller kernel image when procfs is not compiled in.

Have you actually tested that the kernel image got smaller? I have tried
some of this with the /net code, and it didn't make any difference at all,
because the compiler/linker removed the unused function automatically.
(Maybe this is because the /net code is linked into an .a file).

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST