On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Phillips, Mike wrote:
>
> This should be sufficient for 2.4, we'll put the proper solution (the new
> source routing code) into effect for 2.5
Mike, this part looks pretty wrong:
+ if (!spin_is_locked(&rif_lock) ) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rif_lock,flags);
definitely is buggy. Either use "trylock", or just do them all irq-safe (I
would prefer to get a stupid straightforward "all irqsafe" patch first,
and then try to avoid irq latencies by being clever later. Ok?)
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:34 EST