Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> writes:
|> On 2000-03-13T14:12:28,
|> nbecker@fred.net said:
|>
|> > I wonder if some utils will be confused by the strange new entries.
|> > Is this really a good idea?
|>
|> df must be fixed. Has been discussed before. See man statfs.
Hmmmm, SUS2 does not define any special meaning for -1 in struct statfs.
Moreover, fsblkcnt_t and fsfilcnt_t are required to be unsigned integers,
thus -1 does not really fit here.
What's wrong with using zero as before??
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." Andreas.Schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:31 EST