Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 18:26:35 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 2.3.51-52.pre1, shm and mounting somewhere else than /var/shm..."
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[HACK][CFT] procfs without processes."
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> What Jamie is referring to is:

No I wasn't; you found something much more severe :-)

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: 2.3.51-52.pre1, shm and mounting somewhere else than /var/shm..."
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[HACK][CFT] procfs without processes."
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST