Re: Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Mar 08 2000 - 02:35:14 EST

Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 2.2.15pre13 fails to compile in smbfs (was i2o)"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Next in thread: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@metabyte.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 23:21:46 -0800 (PST)

I kinda have my doubts about __irq_itoa,

Let's kill it, as long as everyone uses a printf format
compatible with 'unsigned int' everything should be
fine.

It did help a bit in debugging IRQ assignment problems
on sparc64/PCI for a while though.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 2.2.15pre13 fails to compile in smbfs (was i2o)"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Next in thread: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: Can we dispose of __irq_itoa() ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST