Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?

From: Frank v Waveren (fvw@var.cx)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2000 - 03:00:09 EST

Next message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Mike A. Harris: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 02:56:59AM -0500, Ricky Beam wrote:
> True, but NOT on an 80x24 screen. (And it's "slow as hell.") Please keep
> in mind, ttyquake was designed as a joke (much like the JAVA RADIUS server.)

80x24 is doable. It's just a question of doing good heuristics in the
wetware ;-) . And as for the slowness: Quake's to fast anyway...

;-)

Frank v Waveren fvw@var.cx ICQ# 10074100

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Mike A. Harris: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:16 EST