[Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?

From: Frank v Waveren (fvw@var.cx)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2000 - 02:37:19 EST

Next message: Jos Visser: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Adam Fritzler: "Re: Problems with network autoconfiguration for diskless clients"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Reply: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Reply: Mike A. Harris: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 02:26:48AM -0500, Ricky Beam wrote:
> A VT-420 and screen... that's all anyone ever needs. (Unless you want to play
> quake or something.)

I really didn't want to bring this up, but if I don't, someone else will ;-):

Quake has been linked to aalib, and you can play quake on text terminals.

Frank v Waveren fvw@var.cx ICQ# 10074100

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jos Visser: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Adam Fritzler: "Re: Problems with network autoconfiguration for diskless clients"
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Reply: Ricky Beam: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Reply: Mike A. Harris: "Re: [Going OT at an incredible pace] Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:16 EST