Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes

From: Dimitris Michailidis (dimitris@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com)
Date: Sat Feb 26 2000 - 20:19:37 EST

Next message: David Forrest: "[PATCH] linux-2.2.14/Documentation/sound/ALS007"
Previous message: Nix: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 27-Feb-2000 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Are you using the tulip driver, as I am assuming from $subject?

The eepro driver. But dbench is a disk I/O test (simulates the disk
component of netbench). I just ran it with the network interfaces disabled
and didn't see any difference. On this run throughput was 6.6MB/s with 22%
CPU utilization. A similar box with interfaces also disabled, only 2 CPUs
and 2.3.40 just completed with 62MB/s throughput and 118% utilization.

-- Dimitris Michailidis dimitris@engr.sgi.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Forrest: "[PATCH] linux-2.2.14/Documentation/sound/ALS007"
Previous message: Nix: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PATCH] proposed scheduler enhancements and fixes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:16 EST