Re: /dev/console should it always be available?

From: Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Feb 26 2000 - 15:53:43 EST

Next message: Ricky Beam: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Walter Hofmann: "Re: DMA doesn´t work [kernel 2.2.14]"
In reply to: Mike Panetta: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Guest section DW: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Mike Panetta wrote:

> I did not have this problem with a 2.0.x kernel. Was any of the
> conesole code changed?

Pretty much all of it :-) As I recall, it's basically all-new,
top-to-bottom.

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ricky Beam: "Re: /proc/nzombies"
Previous message: Walter Hofmann: "Re: DMA doesn´t work [kernel 2.2.14]"
In reply to: Mike Panetta: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Next in thread: Guest section DW: "Re: /dev/console should it always be available?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:15 EST