Re: IPX tunnelling over IPSec?

From: Richard Guy Briggs (rgb@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca)
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 09:35:15 EST

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SMBFS: recvmsg called within BH (was: Re: One more boobytrap needed for 2.2.15pre ?)"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
In reply to: Mike A. Harris: "IPX tunnelling over IPSec?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 03:08:53AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Is it possible to have IPX tunnel over IP through an IPSec
> (freeswan) VPN tunnel?

If you can do IPX over IP or IPX over UDP/TCP, then yes.

IPSEC is an *IP* extension.

> Mike A. Harris Linux advocate

slainte mhath, RGB

-- 
Richard Guy Briggs -- PGP key available            Auto-Free Ottawa! Canada
<www.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca/rgb/>                       <www.flora.org/afo/>
Prevent Internet Wiretapping!        --        FreeS/WAN:<www.freeswan.org>
Thanks for voting Green! -- <green.ca>      Marillion:<www.marillion.co.uk>

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SMBFS: recvmsg called within BH (was: Re: One more boobytrap needed for 2.2.15pre ?)"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
In reply to: Mike A. Harris: "IPX tunnelling over IPSec?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:09 EST