Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 07:17:01 EST

Next message: lars brinkhoff: "Re: mmap/munmap semantics"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: si_band type"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If devfs is going to be a mandatory I would like to see a statement
> about this from Linus.

If devfs is going to be mandatory its time to fix it so it isnt. Period.
Some of /proc needs fixing to be non mandatory too.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: lars brinkhoff: "Re: mmap/munmap semantics"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: si_band type"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:09 EST