Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
Richard Gooch wrote:
> I'd advocate we move from a "tough, use procfs" attitude to a "tough,
> use devfs" attitude. If you don't want to have devfs in your kernel,
> you wouldn't want procfs either (if being consistent). After all,
> devfs doesn't *have* to be mounted over /dev.
Let's be realistic here. For most users, disabling procfs ain't gonna
happen. Disabling devfs is the norm, for now...
Regards,
Jeff
Beware geeks bearing gifts. The fox is in the henhouse.
Cheers,
Garst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:34 EST