"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> writes:
> si_band isn't in use in 2.2 to my knowledge, so we could conceivably
> move it after the si_fd member and replace the old si_band with padding,
> but is this really any better than leaving si_band as an int?
Since the type is specified in the standard it's always possible to
pass a pointer to the element around and then `int' looses. But I
won't make the call. All platforms but Alpha are ok now so those who
would have to decide know who they are.
-- ---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:33 EST