On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Benno Senoner wrote:
> > I fixed the buffer.c code according to Ingo and removed a
> > conditional_schedule from mark_buffer_clean in fs.h as spotted by Andrea.
> > I have been testing for over 18hrs and no stuck processes yet.
>
> Interesting, what kind of latencies are you getting now ?
1.1ms to 1.2ms using your rtc_latency test.
> If the patch looks stable to you can you post a 2.2.13 or 2.2.14 patch ,
> so that I can benchmark it ?
>
Its kind of hacked up right now, current kernel is 2.2.14 + 2.2.14aa7
patch + lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 patch + ikd patch. I have not tried the
changes on a bare 2.2.14 and I would recommend 2.2.14aa7 as a baseline.
I was hoping to get more feedback before posting, also I like to
defer to Ingo for official post.
Wm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:33 EST