Re: An article from Microsoft

From: Mike A. Harris (mharris@meteng.on.ca)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 19:28:51 EST

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:

>Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:16:28 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
>From: Yiannis Mavroukakis <ipm@soc.unl.ac.uk>
>To: unlisted-recipients:;;@meteng.on.ca (no To-header on input)
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>Subject: Re: An article from Microsoft
>
>
>What a bunch of bo****k information!!..Someone should really write back to
>those Micro$oft idiots and let them have some unbiased benchmarks about
>linux!!!
>The nerve!!!!!

Holy shit - get OVER IT. You guys are posting shit that is *OLD*
*NEWS*. This was posted here 6 MONTHS ago, at which time all
this same discussion took place, and everyone ceased and
desisted. Not only are you rehashing ANCIENT news that doesn't
matter worth a shit to anyone here or really affect anyone's
choise of OS at all, you are quoting PAGES of the previous post
you are responding to - without needing the quote for any context
purposes.

Let this ANCIENT and MEANINGLESS thread DIE allready. Dead Horse
- beat beat beat... 

--
Mike A. Harris                                     Linux advocate     
Computer Consultant                                  GNU advocate  
Capslock Consulting                          Open Source advocate

Suspicious Anagram #4:
Word:    PRESIDENT CLINTON OF THE USA
Anagram: TO COPULATE HE FINDS INTERNS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST