Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?t

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 13:03:09 EST


> 1. NIS is not broken, NIS works exaclty as it was designed
> by its designers.

Until the NIS code uses connected sockets thats not the case.

> 2. The fact that it does not return now immediately "no such user",
> getting ECONNREFUSED is not a flaw but right thing.

Nope

> 3. Any application which used unconnected UDP socket
> and failed on ECONNREFUSED and EACCES was buggy.
> * Luckily, most of them are already fixed to _ignore_ these errors. *
> See?

They have an option for it SOL_SOCKET, SO_BSDCOMPAT. It has been there for
years. The right way to fix this would be to set that flag when FAVOUR_BSD
is defined in glibc (ie _bsd_socket) . Then nothing else breaks.

The current change is basically vandalism

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST