Re: accept() improvements for rt signals

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2000 - 06:45:18 EST

Next message: Simon Kirby: "Re: 2.3.47-pre6 panics aic7xxx near pci_map_single() (direction =PCI_DMA_NONE)"
Previous message: Gergely Madarasz: "Re: Proposed SyncPPP layer modifications"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Reply: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Im not sure about accept. Certainly for close() you want a queued notifier
of the close completing to clean up the API edges

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Simon Kirby: "Re: 2.3.47-pre6 panics aic7xxx near pci_map_single() (direction =PCI_DMA_NONE)"
Previous message: Gergely Madarasz: "Re: Proposed SyncPPP layer modifications"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Reply: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:27 EST