Re: weird scheduling

From: Folkert van Heusden (fvh@keetweej.demon.nl)
Date: Sat Feb 19 2000 - 18:09:50 EST


James Manning wrote:
> [ Wednesday, February 16, 2000 ] Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME
> > 199 root 20 19 13588 13M 552 R N 0 42.1 10.6 2:50
> > 204 root 20 19 700 700 568 R N 0 32.3 0.5 3:18
> > 118 root 20 19 14100 13M 552 R N 0 24.7 11.0 5:20
> Can you report as to whether the percentages are still the same much
> later? (at least 60 minutes).

They are. That is; most of the time. After a while, precentages
sometimes
are much closer, but they're still jumping between 24% and 38%.
Did I already mention that I user 2.2.14?

> It appears that the processes that have
> used more CPU time overall are getting letting CPU time now, and if
> that's really the case all 3 should settle into a scenario where their
> CPU time used (2:50, 3:18, 5:20 in your snapshot) pretty much "sync up".
> Whether it's desired or not is an orthogonal issue, I just want to know
> if the behavior occurred :)

Nope:

 10:07pm up 23:48, 0 users, load average: 3.07, 3.02, 2.93
47 processes: 43 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 1.7% user, 1.8% system, 96.3% nice, 0.0% idle
Mem: 128076K av, 105068K used, 23008K free, 22704K shrd, 15436K buff
Swap: 144576K av, 5792K used, 138784K free 29300K
cached
 2052 root 20 19 868 868 688 R N 0 45.1 0.6 239:40
gf_client
 2049 root 20 19 13588 13M 552 R N 0 37.3 10.6 211:59
setiathome
 2045 root 20 19 14100 13M 552 R N 0 16.5 11.0 224:40
setiathome

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Folkert van Heusden
http://www.vanheusden.com/
some e-mail addresses: f.v.heusden@ftr.nl, flok99@dds.nl
mobile phone: +31-6-22390057

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST