Re: 2.3.46 Boot Failure

From: Richard Henderson (rth@twiddle.net)
Date: Sat Feb 19 2000 - 13:45:04 EST


On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 12:49:30PM +0100, Gerard Roudier wrote:
> It is fine to be impatient. I have been impatient for about 6 months about
> a fix for the alpha __delay()/__udelay() stuff that can be 200% wrong due
> to inlining and that notably breaks the SCSI clock speed measurement by
> ncr/sym53c8xx at initialisation. This stuff does not seem to have been
> fixed in all still alive linux branches (I mean 2.0/2.2/2.3).

No, it has in fact been fixed.

                ".align 4\n"
                "1: subq %0,1,%0\n"
                " bge %0,1b\n"
                " nop"

That last nop is magic. The type of instruction that follows the
branch affects slotting on ev6, which affects the speed of the loop.

r~

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST