Re: Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 19:02:18 EST

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Kudos to Richard (was Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux)"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [patch-2.3.46-p2] P6 microcode update support"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> 8 characters was more than enough. I was wondering why this was
> changed? Just curious.

8 characters was NOT enough for the other case. The patch I got changed
both 8->9, and for the other case it was definitely needed ("nrawqft0\0"
is nine characters).

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Kudos to Richard (was Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux)"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [patch-2.3.46-p2] P6 microcode update support"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: Patch to zftape-init.c in 2.3.47-pre2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST