Matti Aarnio writes:
> Especially fgwmail and fgwnews seem to exhibit this
> behaviour, fgwmail5 and fgwmail6 don't show up at "bad boys"
> statistics.
>
> 289 fgwnews.all
> 54 fgwnews.not-ok
> 730 fgwmail.all
> 116 fgwmail.not-ok
> 84 fgwmail5.all
> 0 fgwmail5.not-ok
> 73 fgwmail6.all
> 0 fgwmail6.not-ok
This is the statistics of entry-path of the mail flood got from the
received mails headers.
fgwmail 83
fgwnews 82
fgwmail5 45
fgwmail6 31
-------------------
total 241
count(fgwmail) = count(fgwnews) =near count(fgwmail5) + count(fgwmail6)
In your above scenario, why hundreds of duplicated mails are
delivered?
If deliveries to fgwmail5/fgwmail6 always succeed, the duplicated
mails should be not more than 3 or so. Is it wrong?
> I would say fwgmail is having SERIOUS problems, and fgwnews
> nearly as bad.
>
> Out of memory (RAM+SWAP) ? Out disk-space ?
> I don't know what mechanisms can cause sendmail to groak.
I asked to the admin of fgwmail/fgwnews to investigate the machine
status and I forwarded your analysis of them.
I'll report thier investigation result when I get.
> Running http://www.zmailer.org/mxverify-cgi.html with
> your address doesn't reveal *currently* any problems.
> And for that matter, it never would reveal problems, where
> DATA+dot gets accepted, but not acknowledged.
It's your nice CGI script..
I also tried but he claimed nothing.
BTW, what do you mean "not acknowledged"?
-- Computer Systems Laboratory, Fujitsu Labs. kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST