Who is buggy: 2.3.42 or procps-2.0.2?

From: Alexandre Hautequest (hquest@istm.com.br)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 11:03:05 EST

Next message: Dmitriy Mylov: "Network Device Statistics"
Previous message: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

See nice and idle values :)

darkstar:~# uname -a
Linux darkstar 2.3.42 #2 Wed Feb 2 16:47:19 BRST 2000 i586 unknown
darkstar:~# cat /etc/slackware-version
7.0.0
darkstar:~# top

2:00pm up 1:33, 2 users, load average: 1.91, 1.48, 1.19
59 processes: 56 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 50.3% user, 31.1% system, 118.4% nice, 825855.2% idle
Mem: 60084K av, 58416K used, 1668K free, 0K shrd, 560K buff
Swap: 136544K av, 3600K used, 132944K free 19852K
cached

(...)

darkstar:~# _

Any ideas?

-- Alexandre Hautequest - Linux User #116289 "When I'm on the road, I'm indestructible. No one can stop me. But they try..."

O .br que não para de crescer: http://stats.distributed.net/rc5-64/psearch.php3?st=.br

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dmitriy Mylov: "Network Device Statistics"
Previous message: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST