Andrew Park wrote:
> -static int solo1_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pciid)
> +static int __devinit solo1_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pciid)
> {
> struct solo1_state *s;
> - struct pm_dev *pmdev;
>
> it removes declaration of pointer to struct pm_dev, but later in the function
> pmdev appears. I got it compiled by restoring the declaration line, but
> just wondering whether the removal was intentional ...
No sorry, it was an oversight...
Tom
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST