>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@redhat.com> writes:
David> Can you show the routing tables? They are all on the same
David> network, so the kernel can choose whichever interface it
David> pleases to send the packets out, and if your routing tables are
David> how I believe they are, the kernel isn't making new 10.10.10.0
David> network destination routes for eth1 and eth2 because one
David> already exists for eth0.
I have seen older 2.3.x kernels send data out on the wrong interface
even though the interfaces are two different networks, though
connected via the same switch. Ie. I have a 192.168.8.x network for my
gigabit interfaces and a 192.168.9.x for the 100baseT, all going into
the same switch. If I don't disable the 192.168.9.x interface, traffic
seems to migrate to those interfaces even when I explicitly use the
192.168.8.x addresses.
Again, I haven't been ranting over this recently since some of the
kernels I am running are very old (like 2.3.1x).
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:24 EST