Re: ver' big port numbers

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Sat Feb 05 2000 - 00:58:03 EST

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Re: apm bug?"
Previous message: Whygee: "the F-CPU project"
In reply to: Paul: "Re: ver' big port numbers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Paul wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, David Ford wrote:
> @>tcpdump is broken? where can i get a usable copy of tcpdump source as this
> @>is supposedly 'the right stuff'
> @>
>
> Check out http://www.tcpdump.org for the latest....
>
> Paul

21:52:52.430097 208.179.0.193.3189691 > 208.179.0.198.2049: 132 getattr [|nfs]
(DF) (ttl 64, id 0)
21:52:53.830097 208.179.0.193.3189691 > 208.179.0.198.2049: 132 getattr [|nfs]
(DF) (ttl 64, id 0)
21:52:55.997652 208.179.0.198.2049 > 208.179.0.193.3189691: reply ok 96 getattr
[|nfs] (ttl 63, id 59282)
21:54:33.590076 208.179.0.193.32784 > 207.246.129.125.6667: P
2657661578:2657661603(25) ack 1419832676 win 31592 (DF) (ttl 64, id 0)

ok. something isn't right. this is a new compile of tcpdump v5. time to dig
a little deeper.

-d

-- David Ford, Talon Technology

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Re: apm bug?"
Previous message: Whygee: "the F-CPU project"
In reply to: Paul: "Re: ver' big port numbers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST