Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)

From: Daniel.Egger@suse.de
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 20:14:02 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "[patch] ide_timer_expiry bug"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2 Feb, David S. Miller wrote:

> Please, tcpdump would be useful. And it would be excellant if you
> could get an 'strace' log of the process which gets stuck. I bet
> it is calling getpeername() or similar to check the connected'ness
> of the socket and we're doing the wrong thing.

I could get a bit tricky to produce a strace log without a shell,
I'll try a serial console...

Servus, Daniel

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "[patch] ide_timer_expiry bug"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: probably problem with "lo" interface (Re: Strange problem with 2.3.42)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 07 2000 - 21:00:08 EST