Re: IDE, DMA, and lost interrupts.

From: David Ford (david+nospam@killerlabs.com)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2000 - 04:54:11 EST

Next message: rtviado@iligan.com: "gfp called by non-running (1) task from c012ee46"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: deadlock avoidance?"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: IDE, DMA, and lost interrupts."
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "Lost interrupt w/SCSI too (was Re: IDE, DMA, and lost interrupts.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> You may have DMA enabled, but not autodma and the PIIX tuning is not in
> effect.

Yes, precisely. With or without PIIX tuning, if autodma (kernel) is
compiled in, I get lost interrupt and hard lockup on boot.

> > If DMA is enabled in the kernel compile, the last message will instead be:
> >
> > hda: lost interrupt
> >
> > and the laptop will lock up.

-- Open for Y2K - Linux, we never shutdown

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: rtviado@iligan.com: "gfp called by non-running (1) task from c012ee46"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: deadlock avoidance?"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: IDE, DMA, and lost interrupts."
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "Lost interrupt w/SCSI too (was Re: IDE, DMA, and lost interrupts.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 07 2000 - 21:00:06 EST