alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> There is a standard for htonl() and it returns a 32bit type.
That doesn't mean we have to provide or use it _within_ the kernel.
> b/w/d would make more sense in PCI nomenclature. Too late
Why's it too late? Are these names specified in the PCI spec, or just the
Linux code?
We could add {write,read}{8,16,32,64} routines now, #define the old
read[bwl] accordingly, and in early 2.5 start to warn about the use of the old
versions.
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST