Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM

From: Michael Werner (michael@quantum.ece.ucsb.edu)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 20:26:09 EST


Alan Cox writes:

That is the least of your worry. 1000 threads is 8Mb of kernel stacks, and
enough switching of tasks to be sure you might as well turn most of your
cache off. A computer is a state machine. Threads are for people who cant
program state machines.

It is interesting to note that some hardware guys have decided that large
numbers of threads are indeed useful and can perform significantly better on
real problems. The hardware is nothing like an x86.
Lets face it, embarassingly parallel problems are rather trivial to get
linear speedup on. It takes just a few commands in MPI to do it. But for
scientific users there are a large class of problems which are hard to
parallelise and traditional SMP suck at -- Cray T90 (cached memory,SMP) for
example.
A highly threaded machine which is available is the MTA machine from TERA
(SMP). There is an 8 processor MTA at SDSC. Take a look at www.npaci.edu
Its processors have 128 threads which can switch every clock cycle.
There is probably no cache.
And the EV8 Alpha processor is said to have 4 threads
in hardware but thats still O(1). Linux runs on EV67 now.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:28 EST