On 21 Jan 2000, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Wrong again, it makes the code less readable because kzalloc() is a
> non standard function name. This looks more to me like a patch just
> for the sake of the patch.
kzalloc() may sound a bit funny, correct, but if the standard kmem_alloc()
under Linux sounds like kmalloc() then kmem_zalloc() should sound like
kzalloc(), should it not?
Oh well, I don't care - this was a trivial patch that achieved a trivial
goal at a trivial expense, but we have more important issues to deal
with...
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST