Hi Helge,
Friday, January 21, 2000 9:03 AM
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@idb.hist.no> wrote :
> Even better: dynamically use the best algorithm depending on the number
> of
> runnable processes. The only problem I see with this is that calling
> the
> scheduler through a pointer (or if-statement) will have a overhead
> of its own - every time.
You don't need to change the scheduler under normal environments since the
patch
perform equally in these cases giving better results under high load.
Cheers,
Davide.
-- All this stuff is IMVHO- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:25 EST