Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?

From: Fuzzy Fox (fox@foxtaur.com)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 13:23:01 EST

Next message: Blu3Viper: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: CPU usage (Read by `top`)"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> I've lost count of the times I've watched my box fsck huge partitions
> that it hadn't even touched before the crash - not even for an atime
> update.

In such a case (filesystems that it would be nice to have available, but
rarely get touched or examined), you may with to consider an autofs
solution.

-- fox@foxtaur.com (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience. sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment." http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || -- Life Lessons

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Blu3Viper: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: CPU usage (Read by `top`)"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Quiescent filesystems marked with EXT2_VALID_FS while still mounted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:23 EST