>>>>> Jes Sorensen writes:
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Wing <wingc@engin.umich.edu> writes:
Chris> On the bright side, if we change it now, every program using
Chris> glibc will work properly on i386, there will be less overhead
Chris> in the signal code (good because real-time signals should be
Chris> FAST), and the only platform that will require recompiles is
Chris> m68k.
Jes> Which is not like a new platform.
Jes> I am overly behind on the m68k at the moment, so I am not quite sure
Jes> of the impact of this, but if you end up breaking normal signal
Jes> handling on the m68k I must admit I am going to get more than a little
Jes> pissy ;-)
Jes, I've discussed this topic with Andreas Schwab and he told me that
my patch is ok for m68k.
Please reread the discussion: struct siginfo (and not signal handling
in general!) is completly broken with glibc 2.x on m68k - on every
kernel. With my patch to the kernel I bring glibc and kernel in synch
- and remove a lot of uneccessary stuff.
Andreas
-- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST