Leos Bitto wrote:
[cut]
> The bug I was reporting is only int vs. long in .h vs .c. Alan already got
> back to me and promised fixing it in 2.2.15pre4.
Which is bad, since I'm changing the same part as well.
[cut]
> So why are you submitting it to 2.2 which is supposed to be stable?
Why, do you think, does one submit a bug-fix?
I did not (knowingly) change the (broken!) write-support - I submitted a
number of fixes to the read-support in order to at least get THAT PART
into a more stable state.
The QNX4 filesystem was so broken it should IMHO never have entered
2.2.x - since you have it enabled, you ought to know that it was pretty
unusable up till now (but as of 2.2.15pre3 you can at last READ from a
QNX fs all right)!
BTW, why do you insist on having QNX write-support enabled in your
kernel?
Anders
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST