Re: Recent change in tcp_output.c is surely wrong

From: Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 13:25:24 EST

Next message: Elena: "ethertap:"Operation not supported by device""
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Saving all printk() output"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Recent change in tcp_output.c is surely wrong"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: Recent change in tcp_output.c is surely wrong"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> Well if it is unsigned (I only have up to version 2.3.39) and
> looking through this code doesn't show the construct demonstrated;
> I'm sorry for the poor demo. If it is unsigned, why would anyone
> try to out-code a AND?

Apparently someone tried :-)

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Elena: "ethertap:"Operation not supported by device""
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Saving all printk() output"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Recent change in tcp_output.c is surely wrong"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: Recent change in tcp_output.c is surely wrong"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST