Re: timer_bh robusteness fix against potential deadlocks

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2000 - 19:46:12 EST


On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 arijort@valinux.com wrote:

>Are you saying that the entire timer_bh-deadlock patch is bad?
>Or simply the hunk that you refer to below, which begins like this:

All. You can safely reverse such patch completly because it's not
necessary for now.

>ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.14/timer_bh-deadlock-1.gz
>
>I'm assuming it's the whole patch.

You are correct. The whole patch.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST