Re: timer_bh robusteness fix against potential deadlocks

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 14:12:54 EST


On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 tytso@valinux.com wrote:

>It adds one conditional inside a rare 'if' case, so it's not a
>performance issue, and it means that the next time something like this
>happens, the machine will cleanly panic, and leave a very easy to
>understand indication of what went wrong.

I don't like a panic for a thing that we can recover gracefully and
allowing the user to also see the message even if he was running under X 8).

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST