On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> In i2o_activate_controller, what's up with this? Is it a typo, or is it
> supposed to be like that? It's at line 1490. (It _looks_ like a typo,
> but..)
>
> if(i2o_init_outbound_q(c));
> I2O_REPLY_WRITE32(c,virt_to_phys(msg));
>
> Tim.
> */
We already fixed this in 2.3.39, i2o_sys_init clean-ups thanks to Auvo.
BTW, we'd like to know if there are people actually _using_ the i2o stuff,
especially the lan part. It isn't quite ready yet, but if you have extra
i2o hardware lying around (yeah, most probable), could you please give it
a whirl? Oh, btw, it blows up quite nicely on smp ... and you need
something like this:
***snip***
--- i2o_core.c-000111 Tue Jan 11 13:30:01 2000
+++ i2o_core.c Tue Jan 11 19:19:56 2000
@@ -2463,7 +2466,7 @@
#endif
if(i2o_num_controllers)
- i2o_init();
+ i2o_sys_init();
i2o_config_init();
#ifdef CONFIG_I2O_BLOCK
***snip***
to even try it non-modular.
Taneli <taneli@firmament.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST