Re: sched fixes 2.3.36

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2000 - 18:28:47 EST


> tasks. IMHO with the reliable active_mm information we have in 2.3.x (so
> being sure to do the right thing) using a +5 should not hurt (maybe we
> could remove 4 points from the per-processor penality?).

Search the kernel archives for late 2.1.x about jumpy SMP behaviour. People
traced problems back to the processor favouritism.

I also saw no difference on performance when testing multi-cpu load stuff
with different values. I think Ingo also did some stuff with this

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST