Re: sched fixes 2.3.36

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2000 - 12:49:24 EST


> avoiding a TLB flush. I did not benchmarks to check it's better but +1 is
> way too low IMHO. Also it make a lots of sense to make it a per-arch thing

If you increase it above +1 bad things happen and tasks get starved unfairly
at least from testing with 2.1.x before 2.2. I dont think anything has changd
which will have altered this.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST