Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: Add read_poll_count_atomic function

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:35:34 +0200
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> +pub fn read_poll_count_atomic<Op, Cond, T>(
> 
> I understand why you renamed the function, but read_poll_timeout_atomic() would
> still be accurate -- it does perform a timeout in every iteration. Let's keep
> the original name please.

Ok, I'll revert the name.

>> +    mut op: Op,
>> +    mut cond: Cond,
>> +    delay_delta: Delta,
>> +    count: usize,
> 
> Maybe retry would be a slightly better fit compared to count. If we want to be a
> bit more verbose, I suggest retry_count. :)

Sure, I'll go with 'retry'.