Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: pxamci: Simplify pxamci_probe() error handling using devm APIs

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Rakuram,

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 05:28:17PM +0530, Rakuram Eswaran wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 14:01, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes, I suggest to make restructuring .remote a separate patch. (But
> > removing dma_release_channel belongs into the patch that introduces devm
> > to allocate the dma channels.)
> 
> I believe ".remote" is a typo and you're referring to the _remove() function. 
> Removing if(mmc) condition check from pxamci_remove() can be handled in a 
> separate cleanup patch, while removing redundant dma_release_channel()
> will be included in v3. 
> 
> Is my above understanding correct?

ack. remote vs. remove is one of my most-committed typos :-D

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature