Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: display/msm/gmu: Document A612 RGMU

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Sun Oct 19 2025 - 05:13:10 EST


On 17/10/2025 19:08, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> RGMU a.k.a Reduced Graphics Management Unit is a small state machine
> with the sole purpose of providing IFPC (Inter Frame Power Collapse)
> support. Compared to GMU, it doesn't manage GPU clock, voltage
> scaling, bw voting or any other functionalities. All it does is detect
> an idle GPU and toggle the GDSC switch. As it doesn't access DDR space,
> it doesn't require iommu.
>
> So far, only Adreno 612 GPU has an RGMU core. Document RGMU in the GMU's
> schema.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml | 98 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
> index afc1879357440c137cadeb2d9a74ae8459570a25..a262d41755f09f21f607bf7a1fd567f386595f39 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/gmu.yaml
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - pattern: '^qcom,adreno-gmu-x[1-9][0-9][0-9]\.[0-9]$'
> - const: qcom,adreno-gmu
> + - items:
> + - const: qcom,adreno-rgmu-612.0
> + - const: qcom,adreno-rgmu
> - const: qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper
>
> reg:
> @@ -45,24 +48,30 @@ properties:
> maxItems: 7
>
> interrupts:
> - items:
> - - description: GMU HFI interrupt
> - - description: GMU interrupt


Both stay, just explain what is the first interrupt. You should not drop
descriptions here. Look at every other binding - of course except that
terrible Adreno GPU which is anti-example.

> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
>
> interrupt-names:
> - items:
> - - const: hfi
> - - const: gmu
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: hfi
> + description: GMU HFI interrupt

No, descriptions never go to xxx-names, but to xxx.

> + - const: gmu
> + description: GMU interrupt
> + - items:
> + - const: oob
> + description: GMU OOB interrupt
> + - const: gmu
> + description: GMU interrupt
> +
>
> power-domains:
> - items:
> - - description: CX power domain
> - - description: GX power domain
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 3

No.

>
> power-domain-names:
> - items:
> - - const: cx
> - - const: gx
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 3


No. Why?

>
> iommus:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -86,6 +95,44 @@ required:
> additionalProperties: false
>
> allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: qcom,adreno-rgmu-612.0
> + then:
> + properties:
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: Core RGMU registers
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: gmu
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: GMU clock
> + - description: GPU CX clock
> + - description: GPU AXI clock
> + - description: GPU MEMNOC clock
> + - description: GPU SMMU vote clock
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: gmu
> + - const: cxo
> + - const: axi
> + - const: memnoc
> + - const: smmu_vote
> + power-domains:
> + items:
> + - description: CX power domain
> + - description: GX power domain
> + - description: VDD_CX power domain
> + power-domain-names:
> + items:
> + - const: cx
> + - const: gx
> + - const: vdd_cx

This does not make even sense. Why did you remove the the common list
from power-domain-names?

> +
> - if:
> properties:
> compatible:
> @@ -313,13 +360,26 @@ allOf:
> items:
> - const: gmu
> else:
> - required:
> - - clocks
> - - clock-names
> - - interrupts
> - - interrupt-names
> - - iommus
> - - operating-points-v2
> + if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: qcom,adreno-rgmu
> + then:
> + required:
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - interrupts
> + - interrupt-names
> + - operating-points-v2
> + else:

No. Don't nest multiple ifs.

> + required:
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - interrupts
> + - interrupt-names
> + - iommus
> + - operating-points-v2
>
> examples:
> - |
>


Best regards,
Krzysztof