Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Innosilicon hdmi bridge library

From: Maud Spierings
Date: Fri Oct 17 2025 - 05:34:24 EST


Hi Andy,

On 10/17/25 10:56, Andy Yan wrote:

Hello Maud,

At 2025-10-17 15:58:22, "Maud Spierings" <maud_spierings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Andy,

From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Add entry for Innosilicon hdmi bridge library

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

(no changes since v1)

MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f9f985c7d7479..0adcfb1c264a1 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -12299,6 +12299,14 @@ M: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
S: Maintained
F: drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c
+INNOSILICON HDMI BRIDGE DRIVER
+M: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+L: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+S: Maintained
+T: git https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git
+F: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/inno-hdmi.c
+F: include/drm/bridge/inno_hdmi.h
+
INOTIFY
M: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
R: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
--
2.43.0
I believe this patch should be squashed into the patch that actually
creates the files listed in the MAINTAINERS entry, like I do here [1].
Checkpatch should be complaining about patch [1/2] if I'm not mistaken,
when you run `b4 prep --check`.
We talked about something similar here[2]:
Maxime believes they should be separate patches,
And I've seen many merged commits in the kernel are also handle MAINTAINERS entry as separate patches


[2]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/3ygqnj4idey7u4m7ltlv7pnfhkkvcepmpfdijdszctaeopq3ky@qteg33comjl3/

It seems there are indeed opinions about this [3], guess whatever the actual maintainer wants is what will happen, sorry to disturb.


Would be nice to get some central guideline about how it should be.


[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/51b72003-e9a5-4f34-ad08-249fc24b3041@xxxxxxxxxx/


Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009-max25014-v4-1-6adb2a0aa35f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[1]

Kind regards,
Maud