Re: [PATCH v15 1/7] rust: sync: add `SetOnce`

[Andreas Hindborg]

"Benno Lossin" <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 3:06 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> "Benno Lossin" <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Mon Jul 7, 2025 at 3:29 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync.rs b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
>>>> index 81e3a806e57e2..13e6bc7fa87ac 100644
>>>> --- a/rust/kernel/sync.rs
>>>> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync.rs
>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>>>  mod locked_by;
>>>>  pub mod poll;
>>>>  pub mod rcu;
>>>> +mod set_once;
>>>
>>> I would have named this `once`.
>>
>> So module `once` and struct `SetOnce`? Struct name `Once` would lead
>> thoughts to `std::sync::Once`, which is a different thing.
>
> Hmm I thought that `Once` and `SetOnce` would live in the same module,
> but if they don't then I think it's better to keep the `set_once`
> module as-is.

I guess they could live together. I was thinking a module for each. We
can always move it, the module name is not part of a public API.

Let's go with `set_once` for now and we can change it later, if we
decide it is for the better?


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg